Nine Monetization Plays: Four for Startups, Five for Scale-ups
by Madhavan Ramanujam on July 27, 2025
Madhavan Ramanujam's core thesis is that enduring businesses must master both market share and wallet share simultaneously - not choosing one over the other. This dual-engine approach is particularly critical for AI companies who need to get monetization right from day one.
The Market Share vs. Wallet Share Framework
-
Successful companies must dominate both market share and wallet share
- Market share = customer acquisition
- Wallet share = monetization and retention
- "It is not a choice - you need to get better at both"
- Equal attention (not necessarily equal effort) at all times
-
Most companies fall into a "single engine trap" by:
- Growing at all costs while postponing monetization
- Monetizing early but missing acquisition opportunities
- Focusing only on a small loyal customer base
The AI Pricing Power Matrix
![AI Pricing Power Matrix with four quadrants based on Attribution and Autonomy]
Four pricing models based on attribution and autonomy:
-
Seat-based/Subscription (Low Attribution, Low Autonomy)
- For products where value is difficult to attribute and humans remain in the loop
- Example: Traditional SaaS products
-
Hybrid (High Attribution, Low Autonomy)
- Base subscription plus consumption-based components
- For products that clearly improve productivity but still require human involvement
- Example: Cursor, Canva
-
Usage-based (Low Attribution, High Autonomy)
- Pay for what you consume
- For autonomous backend/infrastructure products without direct KPI impact
- Example: Cloud infrastructure
-
Outcome-based (High Attribution, High Autonomy)
- The "golden quadrant" with highest pricing power
- Charge for specific outcomes delivered autonomously
- Can capture 25-50% of value created (vs. 10-20% in traditional SaaS)
- Example: Intercom Fin (charges 99ยข per AI-resolved ticket)
- Currently only ~5% of companies use this model, expected to reach 25% in 3 years
Key Strategies for AI Companies
For Startups (Early Stage)
-
Beautifully Simple Pricing
- Create pricing that customers can easily understand and explain
- Contextualize price based on value (e.g., Superhuman: "$1/day for 4 hours of productivity back per week")
- Test: Can customers articulate your pricing strategy back to you?
-
Frame POCs as Business Case Creation
- Position POCs as co-creating an ROI model, not just testing functionality
- Charge for POCs to filter out non-serious buyers
- Make clear POC pricing is not indicative of final commercial terms
- When pushed for pricing, give ranges tied to value (e.g., "pricing would be $500K-$1M based on the business case")
For Scale-ups
- Master Negotiations
- Gives and Gets: Always ask for something when giving concessions
- Example "get": Request a value audit every 6 months to document ROI
- Value Selling: Create needs, build affirmation loops, co-create ROI models
- Negotiation Tactics: Present options (e.g., fixed price vs. outcome-based) to shift focus from price to value
- Gives and Gets: Always ask for something when giving concessions
Common Traps to Avoid
- Disruptor Traps: Landing but not expanding; winning market share but not holding it
- Moneymaker Traps: Nickel-and-diming customers; pricing so high you hurt acquisition
- Community Builder Traps: Missing new customer segments; training customers to expect more for less
The 20/80 Axiom
- 20% of what you build drives 80% of willingness to pay
- Ironically, that 20% is often the easiest to build
- Many founders give away this 20% for free, then struggle to monetize the remaining 80%
- MVP should mean "Most Valuable Product," not "Minimum Viable Product"
For AI Companies Specifically
- Winners in AI must master monetization from day one due to:
- Cost dynamics (need to manage costs from the start)
- Value capture (avoid training customers to expect more for less)
- If you anchor customers on low prices (e.g., $20/month), you'll struggle to increase later
- AI enables attribution of value in ways traditional SaaS couldn't, creating pricing power
Revisiting Your Pricing Strategy
- In traditional SaaS: Review pricing every 2 years
- For AI companies: Review pricing at least annually
- Price increases should be strategic and value-based
- "If you have a prayer session for doing a 10% price increase, you have a terrible business" - Warren Buffett